- Removal of 35-foot tall dam – the tallest ever removed in Massachusetts
- Staged dam removal throttled the release of about 10,000 cubic yards of “clean” sediment to downstream sediment starved reaches
- Designated as a Priority Project by the MA Division of Ecological Restoration (DER)
- Secured grant funding from the EOEEA Dam and Seawall Repair and Removal Fund in the amount of $633,996 or about 75% of the construction costs
Challenge
Faced with an Office of Dam Safety Order to repair the dam or take it down, the City asked GZA to identify the most cost-effective approach, provide design plans, obtain necessary permits, and act as the resident engineer during construction. The earthen dam with a stone masonry spillway is an approximately 35 feet tall and 125 feet. This High Hazard, former water supply dam had been in a Poor/Unsafe condition since the 1970’s.A dam breach would require tackling the issue of dealing with approximately 27,000 cubic yards of sediment impounded by the dam.
Solution
The City concurred with GZA’s recommendation for dam removal as the preferred alternative. Connecting high-quality trout habitat in the stream above and below the dam made the project a priority for MA Division of Ecological Restoration who eventually became a project partner. After years of meetings and deliberations with city residents and regulators, the City, with the help of GZA and MA DER, was able to obtain concurrence to permit the project as a staged dam removal with a controlled sediment release. The project approach was developed to “throttle” the release of about 10,000 to 11,000 CY of sediment to the downstream sediment starved reaches. A post-construction sediment survey completed in the early fall of 2018 revealed very good agreement with GZA’s design, specifically, the amount of sediment mobilized (about 10,800 CY) and the location of the newly formed stream within the former impoundment.
Benefit
Practitioners from multiple GZA core service areas comprehensively and successfully addressed the City’s engineering, permitting, and construction support needs for the project. GZA also was successful in securing an EOEEA grant to cover 75% of the construction costs. The City’s liability was reduced by removing the Poor condition, High Hazard dam which also resulted in the removal of the tallest dam removal in Massachusetts. Project costs were reduced by using the innovative sediment release approach in lieu of dredging/offsite disposal, saving the City nearly $500,000. The newly formed stream re-established the connectively between two high-quality cold-water fishery habitats.
Article
Geothermal schools: K12 is now ideal for this tech
In a new column for District Administration Magazine, Bruce Fairless and Rania Campbell-Bussiere discuss the advantages a geothermal energy system offers K-12 schools.
Blog
Modernizing Probable Maximum Precipitation Estimates: Anticipating New Challenges in Infrastructure Safety
For many decades, critical structures like dams and nuclear power plants in the United States have been designed to withstand extreme weather events using Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP)...
Article
GZA's Chris Schmitt on New Discharge Prevention Containment & Countermeasure (DPCC) Plan Regulation
The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) has enacted new requirements for Discharge Prevention Containment and Countermeasure (DPCC) Plans, as discussed by Chris Schmitt in the...
Blog
New NPDES Draft Permit in Metro Boston Now Available for Public Comment
Commercial, industrial, and institutional facilities with more than one acre of impervious area in the Charles, Mystic, and Neponset River watersheds will be required to obtain permits for otherwise...